Case 2205821/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Gilroy QC, counsel For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 2205821/2020
- Decision date
- 14 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Spencer
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr P Gilroy QC, counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe supplied PDF text is the reasons judgment in a separate, later victimisation claim (6009474/2024) brought by the same claimant. It refers back to case 2205821/2020 only in passing, stating that the claimant had previously been employed by the respondent as Head of Operational Continuity in Resolution from 4 March 2019 until 4 April 2020 and had lodged proceedings claiming disability discrimination, which 'was successful'. The liability judgment in 2205821/2020 was issued in 2022, with remedy judgments following hearings in April and May 2023.
Beyond confirming that the former disability discrimination claim succeeded and identifying two of the respondent's employees (Mary Pragnell and Lucinda Lambourne) as protagonists mentioned in the liability judgment, the supplied text does not set out the tribunal's findings, legal reasoning, or remedy breakdown in case 2205821/2020. The four monetary figures surfaced by Layer 1 (£160,000, £3,500, £1,850 and £4,000) are not addressed in the supplied text and have therefore not been allocated to any specific head of remedy.
Because the source material does not itself contain the 2205821/2020 judgment, all fields specific to that case are extracted with low confidence and remedy components have been left null rather than guessed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The PDF text supplied relates to a later victimisation claim (6009474/2024). That judgment refers back to case 2205821/2020 as 'the former claim' which it states was 'successful', with a liability judgment issued in 2022 and remedy judgments following hearings in April and May 2023. The Layer 1 listing categories (Disability Discrimination and Unfair Dismissal) and the judgment text only confirm disability discrimination was upheld; the PDF text does not itself contain the former claim's liability or remedy reasoning. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | An unfair dismissal claim is indicated by the gov.uk listing categories for case 2205821/2020, but the supplied PDF text (which concerns the later 6009474/2024 victimisation case) does not adjudicate or describe the outcome of any unfair dismissal claim in 2205821/2020. Outcome set to 'other' with low confidence to avoid invention. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.