Case 2205824/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E M Aguilar Espin v Radiance Property Services — 2022
- Case reference
- 2205824/2022
- Decision date
- 25 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moxon Representation
- Venue
- Central London via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E M Aguilar Espin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the Respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages by failing to pay all monies owed when the employment contract ended. It accepted that the Claimant was entitled to a final gross payment of £2,167.50, made up of 3 days worked, 7 days of accrued but unpaid holiday, and 20 days' notice.
The Respondent had already paid £1,655.50. The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the balance of £512 gross within 14 days of the written judgment. No separate award for interest or other heads of loss was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages arising from failure to pay all sums due on termination. The gross final payment due was assessed at £2,167.50 and £1,655.50 had already been paid, leaving £512 outstanding. | Upheld | — | £512 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £512
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.