Case 2205887/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Akkas v PSEV CIC PSEC Ltd Heard via Cloud Video Platform (London Central) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2205887/2019
- Decision date
- 18 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Akkas
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment records that Mr M Akkas's complaints of constructive unfair dismissal and breach of contract failed and were dismissed. No separate monetary award was made. The text supplied for the decision does not include a fuller explanation of the tribunal's substantive reasoning beyond that outcome.
The hearing was conducted remotely by CVP under rule 46, with the parties' agreement. Evidence was heard from the claimant and Mr Z Qayyum, and the judge recorded that there were no technical difficulties and that no witness was being coached or assisted by an unseen third party while giving evidence. The judgment notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.