Case 2205894/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. Wai Sum Tse v Hackett London Ltd. — 2022
- Case reference
- 2205894/2022
- Decision date
- 24 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Evans Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. Wai Sum Tse
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Wai Sum Tse’s claim against Hackett London Ltd was heard at London Central on 24 October 2022 before Employment Judge S Evans. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms Iglesias, HR Business Partner. Oral reasons were given at the hearing and the written record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The tribunal dismissed the claim on the basis that it had no jurisdiction to consider the complaints raised. The written judgment does not set out any substantive findings on liability, nor does it identify any separate remedy issues. The only recorded outcome is dismissal for want of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment dismisses the claim because the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider the complaints raised. The written record does not specify the underlying complaint(s) beyond that description. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.