Case 2205922/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Pletini v Asser Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2205922/2019
- Decision date
- 25 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brown
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Pletini
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Brown recorded that the claim succeeded against the first respondent, Asser Ltd. The judgment does not identify the particular cause or causes of action in the extracted text, so the specific claim type cannot be stated from this source alone.
The tribunal did not determine remedy in this judgment. It stated that the remedy to which the claimant was entitled against the first respondent would be determined at a hearing listed for 22 to 25 September 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 21 judgment states only that 'the claim succeeds against the first respondent'; the extracted text does not identify the specific claim type or split any remedy by claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.