Case 2205945/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Ansari v Korea Trade Investment Promotion Agency — 2023
- Case reference
- 2205945/2022
- Decision date
- 21 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Ms E Flanagan, Mr S Pearlman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Ansari
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt London Central on 19-21 December 2023, Employment Judge A M Snelson sat with Ms E Flanagan and Mr S Pearlman. The Tribunal's unanimous judgment was that Mr F Ansari's complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded. It also recorded that, pursuant to s.122(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, it declined to make any basic award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal found the complaint of unfair dismissal well-founded, but declined to make a basic award under s.122(2) ERA 1996 and declined to make a compensatory award under s.123(1) ERA 1996, applying W. Devis & Sons Ltd v Atkins [1977] AC 931. | Upheld | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The Claimant's complaint of direct race discrimination was found not well-founded. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.122(2) ERA 1996
- s.123(1) ERA 1996
- W. Devis & Sons Ltd v Atkins [1977] AC 931
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.