Case 2206039/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Bhowmik v Ria Financial Services Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2206039/2019
- Decision date
- 1 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Palca
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Bhowmik
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 1 February 2021, Employment Judge Palca sitting alone in the London Central Employment Tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims against Ria Financial Services Limited. The judgment records claims for breach of contract and for unauthorised deductions from wages, arising from an asserted entitlement to an additional payment in lieu of notice and additional commission payments.
The tribunal found that those claims were not made out and therefore dismissed them. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and no separate remedy calculation is provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claimant alleged entitlement to an additional payment in lieu of notice and additional commission payments; the tribunal held these claims were not made out. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal dismissed the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages on the basis that the asserted additional payment in lieu of notice and additional commission payments were not made out. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.