Case 2206057/2022 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Ms Ann Davies — 2022
- Case reference
- 2206057/2022
- Decision date
- 18 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge P Klimov sitting alone at London Central by video on 18 October 2022. The tribunal held that Bates Solicitors Limited had made unauthorised deductions from Mr Craig Holgate's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay him the gross sum of £4,456.12, representing the amount unlawfully deducted, and to account to HMRC for any tax and NI due on that sum.
The tribunal also dealt with a contract claim brought by the respondent and dismissed that claim for want of jurisdiction. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no separate written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £4,456.12, with tax and NI to be accounted for to HMRC. | Upheld | — | £4,456 |
| Breach of contract | The respondent's contract claim was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,456
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.