Case 2206080/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Benjamin (Representative) v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 2206080/2020
- Decision date
- 21 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Glennie Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms K Benjamin (Representative)
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the London Central hearing on 20 July 2021, Employment Judge Glennie struck out the claim. The written judgment records that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(b) because the manner in which the proceedings had been conducted by the Claimant was unreasonable, and under rule 37(1)(c) for non-compliance with an order of the Tribunal.
The judgment does not set out separate factual findings on the pleaded causes of action, and it does not record any compensation or other monetary award. The case therefore ended at the strike-out stage rather than after liability findings on the substance of the underlying claims.
The judgment also notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of service of the written record.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment strikes out the claim under rule 37(1)(b) and rule 37(1)(c), but does not separate the outcome by pleaded cause of action. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment strikes out the claim under rule 37(1)(b) and rule 37(1)(c), but does not separate the outcome by pleaded cause of action. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(b)
- rule 37(1)(c)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.