Case 2206081/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E Ivanova v Miss Y Tasheva and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2206081/2019
- Decision date
- 27 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Henderson
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs E Ivanova
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs E Ivanova brought claims for unlawful deduction of wages and unpaid holiday pay against Miss Y Tasheva and Tasheva Housekeeping Limited. The tribunal recorded that the case had been case-managed by Employment Judge Joffe, who directed the respondents to clarify alleged invoice inaccuracies, identify invoices said to have been paid in cash, and provide supporting bank or other evidence by 25 February 2021. Although the written case management order was not sent until 12 April 2021, an email from the tribunal on 19 February 2021 made clear that the 25 February deadline still stood.
At the CVP hearing on 22 April 2021, Employment Judge Henderson heard a strike-out application and found that the respondents had no reasonable prospect of success on the issue of the claimant’s status as a worker, referring to the Supreme Court’s Uber case. The judge also found that the respondents had conducted the proceedings in an unreasonable manner and had failed to actively pursue their defence. The response was struck out in its entirety under rule 37(1)(a)-(d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013.
On remedy, the claimant provided an updated schedule of loss and the respondents produced no documentary evidence to challenge it. The tribunal awarded £6,639 gross for unpaid wages and £3,377.40 gross for unpaid holiday pay, making a total award of £10,016.40 gross. The respondents were required to account to HMRC for income tax and national insurance contributions as appropriate.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent’s response was struck out in its entirety, and the tribunal awarded the claimant £6,639 gross for unpaid wages on the basis of her updated schedule of loss, which the respondent did not challenge with documents or evidence. | Upheld | — | £6,639 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent’s response was struck out in its entirety, and the tribunal awarded the claimant £3,377.40 gross for unpaid holiday pay on the basis of her updated schedule of loss, which the respondent did not challenge with documents or evidence. | Upheld | — | £3,377 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,016
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 37(1)(a)-(d) Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
- no reasonable prospect of success
- Uber case
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.