Case 2206112/2020 · Employment Tribunal
did not appear and was not represented For v Ms J Colli — 2021
- Case reference
- 2206112/2020
- Decision date
- 31 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
did not appear and was not represented For
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNeither party attended the hearing. The respondent had not filed an ET3. The claimant had explained shortly before the hearing that he needed a translator because he did not speak English and that the hearing time conflicted with his work. The tribunal considered Rule 47 and decided there was good reason for his non-attendance and sufficient information to proceed in his absence.
The tribunal amended the respondent's name to Ms Jessica Colli after considering the details given in the ET1, the restaurant address, the restaurant contact email address, and LinkedIn information identifying Ms Colli as the owner of Il Blandfords.
The tribunal was satisfied that the claimant worked as a kitchen porter from 23 June to 11 July for 102 hours and had not been paid. Based on the claimant's communication that he worked 102 hours at £10 per hour, the tribunal awarded the sum remaining after lawful tax and National Insurance deductions from the gross sum of £1,020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment ordered payment of such sum as remains after lawful deductions for Income Tax and National Insurance from the gross sum of £1,020. | Upheld | — | £1,020 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,020
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.