Case 2206122/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Sibusisiwe Satimburwa v The Best Connected Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2206122/2022
- Decision date
- 7 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Snelson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Sibusisiwe Satimburwa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3 or Grounds of Resistance. Employment Judge Snelson therefore determined the claim on the ET1 alone under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, without a hearing.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay the claimant notice pay of £600.00. The judgment does not break the award into separate heads of loss; it simply orders payment of £600.00 and directs the respondent to account to HMRC for any tax and NI due on that sum.
The hearing listed for 7 November 2022 was vacated and the parties were directed not to attend.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal said the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay notice pay in the sum of £600.00 and ordered payment of that sum, with HMRC accounting for any tax and NI due. | Upheld | — | £600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £600
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.