Case 2206133/2023 · Employment Tribunal

Miss S Jones v Imperial London Hotels Limited — 2023

Case reference: 2206133/2023
Decision date: 24 October 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Klimov Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss S Jones

Respondent

Imperial London Hotels Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Miss S Jones advanced 13 allegations against Imperial London Hotels Limited, framed as discrimination because of race, age or religion, or alternatively as harassment related to those protected characteristics. The tribunal had previously ordered a deposit of £5 for each allegation, making £65 in total, as a condition of continuing to advance them.

The deposit order was sent to the parties on 24 October 2023. On the Claimant's application, the deadline for payment was extended until 5 December 2023.

No deposit was paid. The tribunal therefore struck out the allegations under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. This judgment records no substantive findings on the merits and makes no remedy award.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The tribunal struck out 13 listed allegations/arguments framed as discrimination because of race, age or religion, or alternatively harassment related to those characteristics, after the Claimant failed to pay the required deposit.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.