Case 2206148/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. James Ross v Terresens UK Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2206148/2022
- Decision date
- 4 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicklin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. James Ross
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the Respondent's response after an open preliminary hearing on 27 September 2024. The Respondent had been notified that the Claimant's strike out application would be determined at that hearing.
The judgment records that the Respondent did not attend or provide an explanation for non-attendance, and did not explain its failure to comply with previous directions about preparing and exchanging the bundle and witness statement. Having considered the Claimant's submissions and the evidence, the Employment Judge allowed the application and struck out the response.
The judgment did not determine whether the Claimant had established his substantive claims or what remedy, if any, he was entitled to. It stated that separate directions and a case management order would follow for a hearing on those issues.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment struck out the response only. It stated that a further hearing would consider whether the Claimant had established his claims and any remedy. | Other | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment struck out the response only. It stated that a further hearing would consider whether the Claimant had established his claims and any remedy. | Other | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment struck out the response only. It stated that a further hearing would consider whether the Claimant had established his claims and any remedy. | Other | Race | — |
| Other | The gov.uk listing refers to a right to be accompanied claim. The judgment itself struck out the response only and did not determine liability or remedy. | Other | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment struck out the response only. It stated that a further hearing would consider whether the Claimant had established his claims and any remedy. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment struck out the response only. It stated that a further hearing would consider whether the Claimant had established his claims and any remedy. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.