Case 2206149/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the Second Claimant: Miss Amy Stroud (counsel) For the First v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 2206149/2023
- Decision date
- 5 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Talbot-Ponsonby Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the Second Claimant: Miss Amy Stroud (counsel) For the First
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the joint case of Mr Kevin Buck and Christopher Hollands at Watford by CVP on 9 and 10 November 2023 before Employment Judge Talbot-Ponsonby. The only finding recorded in the written judgment is that the employment of the first and second claimant was not transferred to Showsec International Limited under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006. On that basis, the claim against the second respondent was dismissed as having no reasonable prospect of success.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The tribunal found that the employment of the first and second claimant was not transferred to the second respondent under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, and the claim against the second respondent was dismissed as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.