Case 2206161/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Khan v Spire Healthcare Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2206161/2021
- Decision date
- 12 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Joffe Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a record of a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Joffe on 11 January 2023. The hearing was listed to determine the respondent's application to strike out the claimant's claims under rule 37 of the Tribunal Rules for failure to comply with Tribunal orders and on the basis that the claimant was not actively pursuing the claims. The tribunal did not strike out the claims, and the final hearing remained as previously listed.
The tribunal recorded that the final hearing date had been put in jeopardy by the claimant's failure to comply with directions and failure to respond to correspondence from the respondent, after the importance of compliance had been explained by Employment Judge Snelson at a case management preliminary hearing on 21 November 2022. The tribunal made new directions on a tight timetable and imposed unless orders requiring the claimant to provide disclosure, respond on the hearing bundle, and exchange witness statements by specified dates, with dismissal to follow automatically if those orders were not met.
No substantive liability issues were determined, no discrimination findings were made, and no remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claimant's claims were not struck out at a preliminary hearing; it does not identify or determine the substantive causes of action. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37 of the Tribunal Rules
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.