Case 2206190/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Peter Flanagan v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 2206190/2018
- Decision date
- 23 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tayler
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Peter Flanagan
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Peter Flanagan brought a complaint of unlawful deduction from wages against CBRE GWS Limited. The tribunal found that he was employed as a Shift Team Engineer, that his gross annual salary was £36,259.93 paid in monthly instalments of £3,021.67, and that he also received allowances of £714.47 per calendar month. He went on sick leave on 30 August 2017 and was contractually entitled to full pay for the first 18 weeks of absence, after which SSP applied.
The tribunal found that a fit note for the period from 28 December 2017 was not submitted until 11 January 2018, after the payroll cut-off, so the claimant was paid in full for January 2018. That created an overpayment for 21 days from 3 January 2018 to 31 January 2018, calculated as £2,928.69. Although a letter from HR on 21 February 2018 was found to be confusing, the tribunal accepted that the respondent then continued paying the claimant's allowance and recouped the overpayment from that allowance in instalments.
The deductions were £714.17 on 23 February 2018, 23 March 2018, 25 April 2018 and 25 May 2018, followed by £72.01 on 25 June 2018. The tribunal held that the respondent was entitled to make the deductions because they were reimbursement of an overpayment of wages, so section 14 ERA 1996 applied and section 13 ERA 1996 did not. It also found that, at least for most of the deductions, the contract and advance notification supported the deductions, although that did not matter to the final result.
The claim therefore failed. The tribunal also rejected the claimant's assertion that he had not been paid for the Bank Holiday on 1 January 2018, finding that the recouped overpayment related to the period starting on 3 January 2018 rather than to that bank holiday.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the deductions were made to recoup an overpayment of wages, so s.14 ERA 1996 excluded the general protection in s.13 ERA 1996. It also found the claimant had not been underpaid for the Bank Holiday on 1 January 2018; the recoupment related to the period from 3 January 2018. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.14 ERA 1996
- s.13(1)(a) ERA 1996
- s.13(2)(a) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.