Case 2206294/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P. Ward, of Counsel For the First v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 2206294/2018
- Decision date
- 20 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharma
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr P. Ward, of Counsel For the First
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the open preliminary hearing, Employment Judge Sharma recorded that the claimant withdrew his unfair dismissal claim and his claim for compensation under the Agency Workers Regulations 2010. The tribunal then dismissed both claims under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, and made no merits findings on liability.
The tribunal also ordered the claimant to pay a contribution of £100 to the first respondent's costs and £100 to the second respondent's costs. No claimant compensation award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Withdrawn by the claimant; the tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Agency worker regulations | Withdrawn by the claimant; the tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £200
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.