Case 2206298/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms EJ Rodican-Jones v DLA Piper UK LLP — 2019
- Case reference
- 2206298/2018
- Decision date
- 22 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rodican-Jones Respondent
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms EJ Rodican-Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a short Rule 52 disposal order dated 12 June 2019. Employment Judge Snelson recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, and the judgment was sent to the parties on 22 August 2019.
The written record does not set out the underlying factual allegations, evidence, or any merits findings. The case listing context supplied with the record refers to unfair dismissal, sex discrimination, and maternity and pregnancy rights, but the order itself does not identify or determine those claims on the merits.
No remedy or monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. The written order does not identify the pleaded claims; the claim type is taken from the case listing context supplied with the record. | Withdrawn | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. The written order does not identify the pleaded claims; the claim type is taken from the case listing context supplied with the record. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. The written order does not identify the pleaded claims; the claim type is taken from the case listing context supplied with the record. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.