Case 2206298/2023 · Employment Tribunal

Mr. G. Oluokun v FPC Global Ltd. Hearing: Public Preliminary Hearing — 2025

Case reference: 2206298/2023
Decision date: 3 January 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Tinnion For

Indexed: 18 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr. G. Oluokun

Respondent

FPC Global Ltd. Hearing: Public Preliminary Hearing

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal recorded that the claimant was employed by the respondent from 12 December 2022 and was dismissed on 30 January 2023. It was not in dispute that the claimant presented his ET1 on 28 April 2023.

The Tribunal applied the two-year continuous employment requirements for unfair dismissal and statutory redundancy payment claims. It found that the claimant had not been employed for a continuous period of at least two years by either the dismissal date or the ET1 presentation date, so the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to consider those claims and struck them out under Rule 37(1)(a).

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	Struck out at a public preliminary hearing because the claimant had less than two years' continuous employment and the Tribunal found it lacked jurisdiction.	Struck out	—	—
Redundancy	Struck out at a public preliminary hearing because the claimant had less than two years' continuous employment and the Tribunal found it lacked jurisdiction.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.