Case 2206317/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Dave v The Secretary of State for Justice and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 2206317/2021
- Decision date
- 11 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Burns
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs R Dave
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent applied on 30 September 2022 for the claim to be struck out under Rules 37(1)(c) and 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The application was made on the basis that the claimant had failed to comply with tribunal orders and was not actively pursuing the claim.
The tribunal wrote to the claimant on 5 and 7 October 2022 asking for comments on the application and warning that the claim was likely to be struck out if no response was received by 4 pm on 10 October 2022. The claimant did not respond, and Employment Judge E Burns granted the application and struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 12, 13 and 14 October 2022 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claim was struck out; the race discrimination classification comes from the gov.uk listing category rather than from the body of the judgment. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim was struck out; the unlawful deduction from wages classification comes from the gov.uk listing category rather than from the body of the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the claim was struck out; the Working Time Regulations classification comes from the gov.uk listing category rather than from the body of the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rules 37(1)(c) and 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rules 70-72 of the Employment Tribunal Rules
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.