Case 2206334/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Klinshov v Gamma VSL Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2206334/2021
- Decision date
- 10 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Connolly Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Klinshov
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant, Mr S Klinshov, worked for Gamma VSL Limited as a stylist from 11 December 2018 until he resigned with immediate effect on 12 July 2021. He was suspended from 1 June 2021 to 12 July 2021 in relation to an allegation that he falsified evidence of a COVID-19 vaccination appointment. The tribunal found that the suspension was on contractual pay, that the Claimant was entitled to be paid in full during that period, and that he was not paid his salary for the six-week suspension period. On the evidence of the contract, payslips, bank statements and the payroll screenshot, the tribunal found the unpaid wages claim was presented in time and was in respect of wages within section 27 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
On remedy for the unpaid wages claim, the tribunal found the Claimant’s annual gross salary on termination was £26,000, giving a weekly gross pay of £500. It awarded £3,000 gross for the six-week period from 1 June 2021 to 12 July 2021 and ordered the Respondent to account to HMRC for tax and national insurance due. The tribunal also found the Claimant was entitled to 28 days’ statutory annual leave per year, that the holiday year ran from January to December, and that he had accrued 2.95 weeks’ leave during the relevant holiday year. After finding that he had taken 10 days’ leave and had received no holiday pay on termination, the tribunal held that 0.95 weeks of accrued but untaken leave remained due.
Applying regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and the relevant contract and handbook provisions, the tribunal awarded £475 gross for unpaid holiday pay on termination and again ordered the Respondent to account to HMRC for tax and national insurance. Both claims therefore succeeded in full on the evidence before the tribunal, and no issue arose as to respondent evidence because the Respondent called no witnesses and did not cross-examine the Claimant.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the Respondent failed to pay the Claimant’s wages during the suspension period from 1 June 2021 to 12 July 2021. The award was the gross sum of £3,000, with the Respondent also ordered to account to HMRC for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £3,000 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the Claimant had 0.95 weeks of accrued but untaken annual leave on termination and had not been paid any holiday pay. The award was the gross sum of £475, with the Respondent also ordered to account to HMRC for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £475 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,475
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
8 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 27 Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 13 Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 13A Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 16 Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 30(1)(b) Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.