Case 2206441/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Leigh Maloney v Love by Lucy and Liam Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2206441/2022
- Decision date
- 1 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Snelson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Leigh Maloney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3. Employment Judge Snelson therefore considered the ET1 under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 and decided the claim could properly be determined without a hearing. The hearing listed for 1 June 2023 was vacated and the parties were told not to attend.
On the papers, the tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay the claimant wages of £481.00 and holiday pay of £475.00. It ordered the respondent to pay £956.00 in total and to account to HMRC for any tax and national insurance due on that sum.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to provide the claimant with written terms of employment. Under s38(3) of the Employment Act 2002, it ordered payment of an additional £952.62, described as two weeks' pay. The judgment states that no tax is due on that award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages in the sum of £481.00. | Upheld | — | £481 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay holiday pay in the sum of £475.00. | Upheld | — | £475 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent failed to provide written terms of employment and, under s38(3) of the Employment Act 2002, awarded the additional sum of £952.62, described as two weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £953 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,909
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- Employment Act 2002 s38(3)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.