in person For the v Respondent — 2022

Case reference: 2206547/2021
Decision date: 29 July 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge P Klimov

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

in person For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At a hearing on 29 July 2022 before Employment Judge P Klimov sitting alone, the tribunal dealt only with interlocutory applications. The respondent's application to strike out the claimant's claims as having no reasonable prospect of success under Rule 37(1)(a) of the ET Rules failed, and the respondent's application for a deposit order under Rule 39 also failed.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The respondent's application to strike out the claimant's claims under Rule 37(1)(a) of the ET Rules failed and was dismissed; the tribunal directed that there should be no strike out order.	Dismissed	—	—
Other	The respondent's application for a deposit order under Rule 39 of the ET Rules failed and was dismissed; the tribunal directed that there should be no deposit order.	Dismissed	—	—
Other	The claimant's application to strike out the respondent's response or, alternatively, to make a deposit order against the respondent was dismissed, having been withdrawn by the claimant.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.