Case 2206573/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Miah v Jisc — 2021
- Case reference
- 2206573/2020
- Decision date
- 11 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Miah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Miah applied on 22 February 2021 for reconsideration of the judgment sent to the parties on 11 February 2021. Employment Judge Davidson refused the application because there was no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked. The underlying decision remained that it would not be just and equitable to extend time for the claim, including the dismissal claim and the reasonable adjustments complaint.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal refused reconsideration of the earlier time-limit ruling. The dismissal claim was presented nearly a year late, and the judge held it would not be just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Reasonable adjustments claim. The tribunal held it was well outside the time limit and that it would not be just and equitable to extend time; reconsideration was refused. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 70(2) no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked
- just and equitable to extend time
- interests of justice
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.