Case 2206584/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Omope For the v VIP Restaurants Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2206584/2018
- Decision date
- 4 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Norris
- Venue
- Central London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Omope For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal heard the case at Central London on 4 September 2019 before Employment Judge Norris, sitting alone. The claimant was represented and the respondent, which was in liquidation, did not appear and was not represented.
The judgment states that the claimant's claim for '(constructive) unfair dismissal' was well-founded and succeeded. The respondent was ordered to pay a basic award of £992.77 and a compensatory award of £1,870.95, making a total of £2,863.72 without deduction.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes the claim as '(constructive) unfair dismissal' and states it is well-founded and succeeds. | Upheld | — | £2,864 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,864
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £993
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,871
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.