Case 2206637/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the Second Claimant: In person For the First v Mrs C Turnball, Solicitor For the Second Respondent: Mr A Savva, Director — 2022
- Case reference
- 2206637/2022
- Decision date
- 20 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the Second Claimant: In person For the First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr K Dzenis and Mrs M Ulyanova brought claims for breach of contract (notice pay), unlawful deduction from wages (holiday pay), redundancy payment, and, for Mrs Ulyanova, statutory maternity pay against Anzhelika Khan and Margot Services Ltd. The judgment records that the claims against the second respondent had been withdrawn and were dismissed under Rule 52, while the claims against the first respondent continued.
By consent under Rule 64, Ms Khan agreed to pay Mr Dzenis £4,553.26 for notice pay and holiday pay together, plus a £15,517 tax-free redundancy payment. She also agreed to pay Mrs Ulyanova £783.82 for notice pay, £1,567.64 for holiday pay, £9,402.48 for statutory maternity pay, and a £2,348.18 tax-free redundancy payment, with the notice pay, holiday pay and statutory maternity pay sums subject to tax and National Insurance deductions. The tribunal made no order as to costs and noted that reasons had been given orally.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The notice pay claims were continued against the first respondent and resolved by consent under Rule 64. The judgment records that the corresponding claims against the second respondent had been withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52. The consent terms included a combined payment of £4,553.26 to Mr Dzenis for notice pay and holiday pay, with no separate split between those heads. | Settled | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The holiday pay claims were continued against the first respondent and resolved by consent under Rule 64. The judgment records that the corresponding claims against the second respondent had been withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52. The consent terms included £4,553.26 to Mr Dzenis for notice pay and holiday pay together, and £1,567.64 to Mrs Ulyanova for holiday pay. | Settled | — | — |
| Redundancy | The redundancy payment claims were continued against the first respondent and resolved by consent under Rule 64. The judgment records that the corresponding claims against the second respondent had been withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52. The consent terms required £15,517 to Mr Dzenis and £2,348.18 to Mrs Ulyanova. | Settled | — | — |
| Other | Mrs Ulyanova's statutory maternity pay claim was continued against the first respondent and resolved by consent under Rule 64. The judgment records that the corresponding claim against the second respondent had been withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52. The consent terms required £9,402.48 for statutory maternity pay. | Settled | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £34,172
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 52
- Rule 64
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.