Case 2206638/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D GRAY v ISS Facility Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2206638/2020
- Decision date
- 4 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D GRAY
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case remotely by Cloud Video Platform at London Central on 3 and 4 February 2021 before Employment Judge P Klimov sitting alone. The claimant was represented by Ms D Woodward and the respondent by Ms C Bell.
The written judgment records that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim failed and was dismissed. It also records that the claimant's breach of contract claim, described in the judgment as wrongful dismissal, failed and was dismissed.
The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the specified time. No monetary remedy was awarded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for unfair dismissal fails and is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment describes this as a claim for breach of contract (wrongful dismissal), which fails and is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.