Case 2206674/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 2206674/2020
- Decision date
- 7 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O Segal QC
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt an open preliminary hearing on 7 September 2021 before Employment Judge O Segal QC, the tribunal decided whether Mrs P Waller was disabled within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010. The condition relied on was depression/anxiety disorder. The respondent did not dispute the claimant's account of her symptoms from November 2018 onwards, and the tribunal heard oral evidence from the claimant together with medical records and other documents.
Applying the statutory definition and the authorities it cited, including Goodwin v Patent Office, J v DLA Piper UK LLP, Cruickshank v Vaw Motorcast Ltd, McNicol v Balfour Beatty Rail Maintenance Ltd, Rugamer v Sony Music Entertainment UK Ltd, Rayner v Turning Point and Nissa, the tribunal found that the claimant had a mental impairment and that it produced substantial adverse effects on normal day-to-day activities. By March 2019 at the latest, she was having difficulty understanding and retaining what people said to her, including at work, and her interactions with others were becoming increasingly problematic.
On long-term effect, the tribunal concluded that the statutory test was met from approximately May 2019. It found that the symptoms had been present continuously since November 2018, were worsening, and that it could well happen, viewed at that time and without hindsight, that the substantial adverse effects would last for at least 12 months. The judgment therefore declares that the claimant was disabled between at least May 2019 and June 2020 inclusive. No monetary remedy was determined because the hearing was confined to the preliminary disability issue.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal determined that the claimant was disabled within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010 between at least May 2019 and June 2020 inclusive. The underlying discrimination merits were not decided in this judgment. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- s. 6 EqA 2010
- Sch 1 para 1 EqA 2010
- Goodwin v Patent Office
- J v DLA Piper UK LLP
- Cruickshank v Vaw Motorcast Ltd
- McNicol v Balfour Beatty Rail Maintenance Ltd
- Rugamer v Sony Music Entertainment UK Ltd
- Rayner v Turning Point
- Nissa
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.