Case 2206688/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Giulia Aceri v Damazein Family Office Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2206688/2021
- Decision date
- 7 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation For
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Giulia Aceri
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningGiulia Aceri brought a claim against Damazein Family Office Ltd at London Central. The judgment records that Tribunal Judge Plowright gave oral reasons at the hearing and that the claimant appeared in person, while the respondent was represented by Mr E Dowler, General Counsel for the company.
The tribunal upheld the claimant’s unlawful deduction from wages claim insofar as it related to arrears of pay. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £3,458.98.
The claimant’s unlawful deduction from wages claim in relation to holiday pay was dismissed. The judgment records no separate award for that claim and no other remedy components.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim succeeded insofar as it related to arrears of pay. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £3,458.98. | Upheld | — | £3,459 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim in relation to holiday pay was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,459
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.