Case 2206711/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Jason and Irha Ventures Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2206711/2020
- Decision date
- 12 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Joffe Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr T Acikyildiz brought a claim against Jason and Irha Ventures Limited. The respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance, did not appear, and was not represented at the hearing before Employment Judge Joffe on 12 January 2021.
The tribunal held that the respondent unlawfully failed to pay wages to the claimant. It therefore ordered the respondent to pay £995.32 net. The judgment also records that the respondent is to account to HMRC for tax and National Insurance contributions on the gross sum of £1,244.16.
The claimant’s claim for interest was not upheld. The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Respondent failed to file an ET3 and did not appear. Tribunal found it unlawfully failed to pay wages. It ordered payment of £995.32 net and recorded that the respondent must account to HMRC for tax and National Insurance contributions on the gross sum of £1,244.16. | Upheld | — | £995 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £995
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.