Case 2206728/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Carroll v Transport for London — 2023
- Case reference
- 2206728/2022
- Decision date
- 3 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Carroll
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant failed to attend the preliminary hearing on 3 February 2023 without explanation and did not comply with tribunal orders requiring information about his claim, his disability and a schedule of loss. He had not applied for an extension of time with reasons.
The tribunal issued further orders and strike-out warnings, including an order dated 5 June 2023 and then a varied order giving the claimant one further opportunity to say whether he was proceeding with the claim and to explain his failures to attend and comply. The claimant did not provide the required information by the deadline, so the claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment dismissed the claim procedurally after the claimant failed to attend a preliminary hearing and failed to provide ordered information about his claim and disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The gov.uk listing category identifies unlawful deduction from wages, but the judgment itself does not set out particulars of this claim; the claim as a whole was dismissed procedurally. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rules 37(1)(c) and (d)
- rule 38
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.