Case 2206744/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Chandra v University and College Union and others — 2023
- Case reference
- 2206744/2022
- Decision date
- 9 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Connolly Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr V Chandra, brought claims against the University and College Union and a number of individual respondents. At the hearing on 27 April 2023, the tribunal dealt only with jurisdiction. The claimant appeared in person and the respondents for R1 to R26 and R28 were represented; R27 did not attend.
The tribunal's judgment stated that the claimant's claims against the 2nd to 28th respondents were dismissed because the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider them. No further findings on the merits of any claim are set out in the written judgment provided.
The decision was sent to the parties on 10 May 2023. The tribunal noted that written reasons would not be provided unless a written request was made within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal dismissed the claims against the 2nd to 28th respondents because it did not have jurisdiction to consider them. The judgment does not identify any separate substantive award. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.