Case 2206755/2018 · Employment Tribunal

In person v Respondent — 2019

Case reference: 2206755/2018
Decision date: 19 June 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Glennie Representation
Venue: London Central

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

In person

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Glennie on 13 and 14 June 2019. The Tribunal recorded that it did not have territorial jurisdiction over the claimant's complaints under the Employment Rights Act 1996 and the Equality Act 2010.

As a result, the complaints were struck out. The written record does not set out any merits findings on the underlying unfair dismissal, unlawful deduction from wages, or discrimination allegations, and no remedy was awarded.

The judgment was dated 17 June 2019 and sent to the parties on 19 June 2019. The note at the end states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.

Claims and outcomes

5 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	Struck out because the Tribunal held it did not have territorial jurisdiction over the complaints under the Employment Rights Act 1996.	Struck out	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	Struck out because the Tribunal held it did not have territorial jurisdiction over the complaints under the Employment Rights Act 1996.	Struck out	—	—
Disability discrimination	Struck out because the Tribunal held it did not have territorial jurisdiction over the complaints under the Equality Act 2010.	Struck out	Disability	—
Race discrimination	Struck out because the Tribunal held it did not have territorial jurisdiction over the complaints under the Equality Act 2010.	Struck out	Race	—
Sex discrimination	Struck out because the Tribunal held it did not have territorial jurisdiction over the complaints under the Equality Act 2010.	Struck out	Sex	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.