Case 2206756/2022 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Ms R Page, solicitor — 2023
- Case reference
- 2206756/2022
- Decision date
- 19 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at London Central by video on 19 June 2023 before Employment Judge P Klimov sitting alone. The written record states that the claimant was represented by himself and the respondent by Ms R Page, solicitor. The judgment records only the outcome, namely that the claimant's claim failed and was dismissed.
The reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written record states that no written reasons will be provided unless a request was made at the hearing or is presented in writing within 14 days of the sending of the written record. No separate findings of fact, legal analysis, or remedy were included in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment records only that the claimant's claim failed and was dismissed; no separate reasons for this claim are set out in the extracted text. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment records only that the claimant's claim failed and was dismissed; no separate reasons for this claim are set out in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.