Ms S Alborno v Peter Schofield — 2022

Case reference: 2206777/2020
Decision date: 14 March 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Slater Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms S Alborno

Respondent

Peter Schofield

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

By a letter dated 12 January 2022, the Tribunal gave Ms S Alborno an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit. The respondent also applied on 7 February 2022 for the claim to be struck out, including on the ground that it had not been actively pursued.

The claimant did not make any written representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Slater struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. The hearing listed for 20 June 2022 was vacated and did not take place.

The extracted judgment does not set out the underlying substantive allegations, and it records no monetary remedy or liability findings beyond the strike-out order.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The extracted judgment does not specify the underlying claim types; it records that 'the claim' was struck out because it had not been actively pursued after the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.