Case 2206801/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Finnan v Outbound Solutions Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2206801/2020
- Decision date
- 16 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Norris Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Finnan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend the hearing listed for 9 and 10 February 2021, and the judgment records that there was no explanation for his non-attendance. The Employment Judge said practicable enquiries were made by telephone and email before proceeding under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
Because the claimant failed to attend and was not represented, the tribunal dismissed the claim. The judgment does not set out any findings on the underlying merits of the substantive complaints, and it records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment dismisses the claim because the claimant did not attend the hearing listed for 9 and 10 February 2021. The merits of the unfair dismissal allegation were not determined. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment dismisses the claim because the claimant did not attend the hearing listed for 9 and 10 February 2021. The merits of the wage deduction allegation were not determined. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.