Case 2206838/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Grigorian v Equiti Capital UK Limited (the Second Respondent / R2) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2206838/2018
- Decision date
- 16 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Grigorian
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a short rule 52 judgment signed by Employment Judge Wade. It records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.
The judgment does not set out any findings on liability, evidence, or remedy, and it contains no monetary award. The only recorded outcome is that the proceedings came to an end after the claimant withdrew the claim.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the specific pleaded claim is not identified in the PDF. This claim type is taken from the case listing category. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the specific pleaded claim is not identified in the PDF. This claim type is taken from the case listing category. | Withdrawn | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the specific pleaded claim is not identified in the PDF. This claim type is taken from the case listing category. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the specific pleaded claim is not identified in the PDF. This claim type is taken from the case listing category. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the specific pleaded claim is not identified in the PDF. This claim type is taken from the case listing category. | Withdrawn | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.