Case 2206843/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Marianna Michael v New Talent Fashion Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2206843/2022
- Decision date
- 6 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Marianna Michael
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not attend the hearing or defend the claim. The tribunal proceeded under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2013, refused to postpone the hearing, refused an extension of time to defend, and determined the claim in the respondent's absence.
On the merits, the tribunal found two unauthorised deductions from wages. First, it held that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's wages for the months January to June 2022 and ordered payment of £6,065. Second, it held that the respondent had failed to pay a £5,000 bonus due on completion of Northern Fashion Week under the claimant's contract and ordered payment of that sum.
The judgment records a total award of £11,065. It does not record any separate award for interest or other remedy components.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay wages for January to June 2022. | Upheld | — | £6,065 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay a £5,000 bonus due on completion of Northern Fashion Week under the claimant's contract. | Upheld | — | £5,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,065
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.