Case 2206861/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Weishaupt v RQ Café Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2206861/2022
- Decision date
- 22 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Isaacson Representation
- Venue
- London Central in public
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Weishaupt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim because Mr Weishaupt did not have two years' continuous service. No unfair dismissal remedy was therefore awarded.
The claimant succeeded on holiday pay. The tribunal found he was entitled to 5 days' accrued holiday entitlement and calculated the award at a daily rate of £134.62, giving £673.10 gross.
The claimant also succeeded on notice pay. The tribunal found he was entitled to one week's notice and calculated this at £673.10 gross, based on an annual salary of £35,000.
The claim for unauthorised deduction from wages in relation to pay for hours worked succeeded. The tribunal calculated 671 hours worked at £14 per hour, giving £9,394, then deducted payments already received totalling £4,724.26 and tax and NIC deducted from the June and July payslips totalling £1,018.54. The resulting award on that claim was £3,651.20 gross. The total gross amount payable to the claimant was £4,997.40.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant did not have two years' continuous service. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Succeeding claim for 5 days accrued holiday entitlement at a daily rate of £134.62, totalling £673.10 gross. | Upheld | — | £673 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay succeeded; the tribunal found the claimant was entitled to one week's notice calculated at £673.10 gross based on an annual salary of £35,000. | Upheld | — | £673 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unauthorised deduction from wages in relation to hours worked succeeded. The tribunal calculated £9,394 for 671 hours at £14 per hour, less payments received of £4,724.26 and less tax/NIC deducted from June and July pay slips of £1,018.54. | Upheld | — | £3,651 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,997
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.