Case 2206883/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person For v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 2206883/2018
- Decision date
- 14 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hildebrand
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the open preliminary hearing on 21 and 22 May 2019, Employment Judge Hildebrand, sitting alone, determined the issue of whether the Claimants were employees of the Respondent. The tribunal found that they were not employees and therefore could not bring unfair dismissal claims.
The tribunal also found that the Claimants did not have two years' continuous service, so they could not claim unfair dismissal on that separate basis either. The unfair dismissal claims were therefore struck out. The judgment records that holiday pay claims had been listed for hearing in a case management order, but no substantive determination was made on those claims in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the Claimants were not employees of the Respondent and, separately, that they did not have two years' continuous service. On those bases the unfair dismissal claims could not proceed and were struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.