Case 2206885/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Roswell v Nat West Group plc — 2021
- Case reference
- 2206885/2020
- Decision date
- 22 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Roswell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs J Roswell brought a direct race discrimination claim against Nat West Group Plc. The hearing took place by CVP at Manchester on 28 October 2021 before Employment Judge Cookson. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was represented by Mr Broomhead, solicitor, and the respondent by Ms Coutts, solicitor.
The tribunal dismissed the claim because it was not presented within three months of the alleged act of discrimination. It also found that the claim was not submitted within any further period that would be just and equitable under section 123(1)(b) of the Equality Act 2010. Written reasons were requested and noted as to be provided in due course, but the judgment itself records dismissal on limitation grounds.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal held that the direct race discrimination claim was not submitted within 3 months of the alleged act of discrimination and was also not within such further period as was just and equitable under s.123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.