Case 2206908/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Tamuke v Sterling Solutions Umbrella Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2206908/2020
- Decision date
- 5 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khan Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Tamuke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim by Mr A Tamuke against Sterling Solutions Umbrella Ltd was heard at London Central Employment Tribunal by Employment Judge Khan on 11 June and 5 August 2021, conducted via CVP. The tribunal struck out the claim because it did not have jurisdiction to consider it.
The written judgment states that, although it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to have presented the claim in time, the further period of six months taken to present the claim was not reasonable. No merits determination or monetary remedy is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action; it records only that the claim was struck out for lack of jurisdiction because, although it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim in time, the further six-month delay was not reasonable. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- not reasonably practicable
- reasonable period
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.