Case 2206909/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. A Antwi-Nsiah v London Business Conference Group Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2206909/2020
- Decision date
- 30 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wade Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. A Antwi-Nsiah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules, the Regional Employment Judge considered the ET1 and determined the claim without a hearing.
The Tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages to the claimant. The claimant had sought three weeks of unpaid wages, which the Tribunal calculated as £2,019 gross.
The Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £2,019 and to account to HMRC for the tax and National Insurance due. The hearing listed for 3 August 2021 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent did not file an ET3. The Tribunal determined the claim under Rule 21 without a hearing and found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay three weeks of wages, calculated at £2,019 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,019 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,019
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.