Case 2206950/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Mukunde v Siemens Mobility Ltd Heard by Cloud video — 2021
- Case reference
- 2206950/2019
- Decision date
- 11 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed
- Panel members
- Ms A Crosby, Ms H Edwards
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Mukunde
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe unanimous tribunal, sitting before Employment Judge Reed with Ms A Crosby and Ms H Edwards, recorded that the claimant's age discrimination claim was struck out. The written record does not set out the reasoning, and notes that written reasons would not be provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing unless a request was made in time.
The tribunal also recorded that Siemens Mobility Ltd did not discriminate against Mr D Mukunde on the ground of race. No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment, and the document contains only the dispositive orders rather than a written explanation of the tribunal's reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Claim struck out. The written record does not state the basis for strike out and notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | The tribunal recorded that the respondent did not discriminate against the claimant on the ground of race. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.