Case 2206953/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 2206953/2018
- Decision date
- 21 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A James
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- Mrs J Cameron, Mr B Tyson
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Denise Reid's case was heard at London Central on 19, 20 and 21 November 2019 before Employment Judge A James sitting with Mrs J Cameron and Mr B Tyson. The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim under section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The written judgment record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The tribunal also dismissed the claims for direct age, sex and race discrimination under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010, and dismissed the indirect age discrimination claim under section 19 of the Equality Act 2010. It ordered the claimant to pay a contribution towards the respondent's legal costs in the sum of £2,750.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Grouped in the tribunal's dismissal of the direct age, sex and/or race discrimination claims under s13 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Sex discrimination | Grouped in the tribunal's dismissal of the direct age, sex and/or race discrimination claims under s13 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | Grouped in the tribunal's dismissal of the direct age, sex and/or race discrimination claims under s13 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Age discrimination | Dismissed as indirect age discrimination under s19 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,750
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s13 Equality Act 2010
- s19 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.