Case 2206975/2018 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Secrets (Western) Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2206975/2018
- Decision date
- 8 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Walker Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in London Central on 7 November 2019, before Employment Judge Walker, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal held that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim succeeded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a total of £11,691 by way of basic and compensatory award. That sum was made up of a £4,191 basic award and a £7,500 compensatory award, with each figure calculated after adjustment for contributory fault.
The tribunal also dismissed all of the claimant's discrimination claims. The extracted judgment does not break those discrimination claims down further, but the case listing identifies the discrimination category as religion or belief.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal upheld the unfair dismissal claim and awarded a total of £11,691, made up of a £4,191 basic award and a £7,500 compensatory award, each calculated after adjustment for contributory fault. | Upheld | — | £11,691 |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment states that all the claimant's discrimination claims were dismissed. The discrimination head is identified from the case listing as religion or belief discrimination. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,691
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,191
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £7,500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.