Case 2207001/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C King v Under the Clouds Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2207001/2021
- Decision date
- 22 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Klimov
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C King
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a video hearing on 22 February 2022, Employment Judge Klimov sitting alone recorded a judgment by consent in the case of Miss C King v Under the Clouds Limited. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £268.86 gross.
The judgment further records that all of the claimant’s claims and the respondent’s counterclaim were dismissed on withdrawal. No substantive liability findings, legal analysis, or remedy breakdown are given in the judgment text beyond the agreed payment and the withdrawals.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment does not itemise the claimant’s claims; this type is taken from the case listing category for public interest disclosure. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not itemise the claimant’s claims; this type is taken from the case listing category for unlawful deduction from wages. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £269
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.