Case 2207029/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Comet and others, PSU For v Ms S Dickinson, Solicitor — 2019
- Case reference
- 2207029/2018
- Decision date
- 5 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Welch Members
- Panel members
- Mr R Pall, Ms G Gillman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Comet and others, PSU For
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at London Central before Employment Judge Welch with members Mr R Pall and Ms G Gillman, heard the claim over 3 to 5 September 2019. It concluded unanimously that the claimant's complaints of constructive unfair dismissal and disability discrimination were not well founded.
The judgment states that both complaints failed and that all claims were dismissed. The written record also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal said the complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was not well founded and would fail. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal said the disability discrimination complaint was not well founded and would fail. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.