Case 2207063/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. P. Dias v The R&R Restaurant Group Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2207063/2021
- Decision date
- 19 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wade Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. P. Dias
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Regional Employment Judge Wade therefore determined the claim on the papers under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, without a hearing. The hearing listed for 24 to 25 May 2022 was vacated.
On the ET1, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to make a redundancy payment, had unfairly dismissed the claimant, and had failed to pay wages / holiday pay. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £2,625.00 and to account to HMRC for any tax and national insurance due on that amount. The judgment does not break the award down between the heads of claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers collectively to "wages / holiday pay" and does not split the award between wage and holiday-pay elements. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,625
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.